Important Supreme Court Cases

24 December 2022
4.9 (224 reviews)
40 test answers

Unlock all answers in this set

Unlock answers (36)
question
Marbury v. Madison (1803)
answer
Established judicial review; midnight judges; John Marshall; power of the Supreme Court.
question
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
answer
Established national supremacy; established implied powers; use of elastic clause; state unable to tax federal institution; John Marshall; "the power to tax involves the power to destroy".
question
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
answer
Established a broad interpretation of the Commerce Clause; determined Congress's power encompassed virtually every form of commercial activity. The Commerce Clause has been the constitutional basis for much of Congress's regulation of the economy.
question
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)
answer
Established separate by equal. Gave Supreme Court approval to Jim Crow laws.
question
Weeks v. U.S. (1914)
answer
Established the Exclusionary Rule at the federal level; illegally obtained evidence cannot be used in court.
question
Schenck v. U.S. (1919)
answer
Oliver Wendell Holmes; clear and present danger test; shouting 'fire' in a crowded theatre; limits on speech, esp. in wartime.
question
Gitlow v. New York (1925)
answer
Established precedent of federalizing Bill of Rights (applying them to the states); states cannot deny freedom of speech- protected through due process clause of Amendment 14.
question
Near v. Minnesota (1931)
answer
Held that the 1st Amendment protects newspapers from prior restraint.
question
Palko v. Connecticut (1937)
answer
Provided test for determining which parts of Bill of Rights should be federalized; those which are implicitly or explicitly necessary for liberty to exist.
question
Korematsu v. U.S. (1944)
answer
Upheld as constitutional the internment of Americans with Japanese descent during WWII.
question
Brown v. Board, 1st (1954)
answer
School segregation unconstitutional; segregation psychologically damaging to blacks; overturned separate but equal; use of 14th Amendment; judicial activism of Warren Court; unanimous decision.
question
Brown v. Board, 2nd (1955)
answer
Ordered schools to desegregate "with all due and deliberate speed."
question
Roth v. United States (1957)
answer
Established that "obscenity is not within the area of constitutionally protected speech or press."
question
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
answer
Established exclusionary rule; illegally obtained evidence cannot be used in court; Warren Court's judicial activism in criminal rights.
question
Engel v. Vitale (1962)
answer
Prohibited state-sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools by virtue of the 1st Amendment's establishment clause and the 14th Amendment's due process clause; Warren Court's judicial activism.
question
Baker v. Carr (1962)
answer
"One man, one vote." Ordered state legislative districts to be as near equal as possible in population; Warren Court's political judicial activism.
question
Abbington v. Schempp (1963)
answer
Prohibited devotional Bible reading in public schools by virtue of establishment clause & 14th Amendment's due process clause. Warren Court's judicial activism.
question
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
answer
Ordered states to provide lawyers for those unable to afford them in criminal proceedings. Warren Court's judicial activism in criminal rights.
question
Wesberry v. Sanders (1963)
answer
Ordered House districts to be as near equal in population as possible.
question
NY Times v. Sullivan (1964)
answer
Held that statements about public figures are libelous only if made with malice and reckless disregard for the truth.
question
Griswald v. Connecticut (1965)
answer
Established right of privacy through 4th & 9th Amendments. Set a precedent for Roe v. Wade.
question
Miranda v. Arizona (1965)
answer
Established Miranda warnings of counsel and silence. Must be given before questioning. Warren Court's judicial activism in criminal rights.
question
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)
answer
Established 3-part test to determine if establishment clause is violated: nonsecular purpose, advances/inhibits religion, excessive entanglement with government.
question
Miller v. California (1973)
answer
Established that community standards be used in determining whether material is obscene in terms of appealing to 'prurient interest', being 'patently offensive', and lacking in value.
question
Roe v. Wade (1973)
answer
Established national abortion guidelines; trimester guidelines; no state interference in 1st; state may regulate to protect health of mother in 2nd; state may regulate to protect health of unborn child in 3rd. Inferred from right of privacy established in Griswald v. Connecticut.
question
U.S. v. Nixon (1974)
answer
Allowed for executive privilege, but not in criminal cases; "Even the President is not above the law"; Watergate.
question
Buckley v. Valeo (1976)
answer
1st Amendment protects campaign spending; legislatures can limit contributions, but not how much one spends of his own money on campaigns. The decision opened the door for PACs to spend unlimited amounts of money for campaigning activities so long as they're not directly coordinated with a particular campaign.
question
Gregg v. Georgia (1976)
answer
Upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty; death penalty does not constitute cruel & unusual punishment; overturned Furman v. Georgia (1972).
question
U.C. Regents v. Bakke (1978)
answer
Bakke & UC Davis Med School; declared strict quotas unconstitutional but states may allow race to be taken into account as ONE factor in admissions decisions. Bakke was admitted; affirmative action.
question
Texas v. Johnson (1989)
answer
Struck down a law banning the burning of the American flag on the grounds that such action was symbolic speech protected by the 1st Amendment.
question
Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)
answer
States can regulate abortion, but not with regulations that impose "undue burden" upon women; did not overturn Roe, but gave state more leeway in regulating abortion (e.g., 24-hour waiting period, parental consent for minors)
question
Shaw v. Reno (1993)
answer
No racial gerrymandering; race cannot be the sole or predominant� factor in redrawing legislative boundaries; majority-minority districts.
question
U.S. v. Lopez (1995)
answer
Gun Free School Zones Act exceeded Congress's authority to regulate interstate commerce. The first case to begin reigning in Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause.
question
Clinton v. NY (1998)
answer
Banned presidential use of line item veto.
question
Bush v. Gore (2000)
answer
Use of 14th Amendment's equal protection clause to stop the Florida recount in the 2000 election.
question
Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002)
answer
Public money can be used to send disadvantaged children to religious schools in tuition voucher programs.
question
Ashcroft v. ACLU (2002)
answer
Struck down a federal ban on 'virtual' child pornography.
question
Lawrence v. Texas (2003)
answer
Using right of privacy, struck down Texas law banning sodomy.
question
Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)
answer
Struck down use of 'bonus points' for race in undergrad admissions at University of Michigan; affirmative action
question
Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)
answer
Allowed the use of race as a general factor in law school admissions at University of Michigan; affirmative action.