Question 1

In Duckworth v. Eagan (1988), the Supreme Court held that the police

Accepted Answer

could create their own Miranda warning if it communicated the same message.

Question 2

Which of these statements describes a Fifth Amendment protection?

Accepted Answer

No one can be tried twice for the same crime.

Question 3

The Supreme Court's decisions in Terry v. Ohio (1967) and Horton v. California (1990) both held that the police

Accepted Answer

may, in certain cases, search individuals or seize their property without a warrant.

Question 4

In New York v. Quarles (1983), the Supreme Court ruled that Miranda rights do not have to be read if a suspect

Accepted Answer

puts public safety at immediate risk.

Question 5

Which of these statements accurately describes the Fifth Amendment?

Accepted Answer

All citizens are entitled to due process.

Question 6

How did the Supreme Court rule in the Miranda decision?

Accepted Answer

Ernesto Miranda had been denied his rights.

Question 7

Under due process, all people accused of crimes are subject to

Accepted Answer

rules that are the same for everyone.

Question 8

A warrant, which specifies the location that can be searched and exactly what can be legally seized, must be issued by a

Accepted Answer

judge.

Question 9

Which of these statements accurately describes the Fourth Amendment?

Accepted Answer

The Fourth Amendment describes a fair process for searches and seizures.

Question 10

Which is a grand jury right?

Accepted Answer

the right to indictment before trial for a capital crime

Due Process (Gov Unit 3)

Unlock all answers in this set