Science Based Communication Answer Keys

25 July 2022
4.7 (114 reviews)
17 test answers

Unlock all answers in this set

Unlock answers (13)
question
Typical methods of classroom scientific communication include
answer
lectures, lab reports, term papers, and poster presentations.
Explanation: There are many ways that scientists communicate in the classroom setting. Some common methods include lectures, discussions, small group work, and presentations. Each of these methods has its own advantages and disadvantages, and each can be used to communicate different types of information.Lectures are a common method of classroom communication. They are typically used to communicate large amounts of information to a group of students. Lectures can be very effective if they are well-organized and the speaker is clear and concise. However, lectures can also be very boring and can cause students to tune out if they are not interesting.Discussions are another common method of classroom communication. They are typically used to allow students to interact with each other and with the material. Discussions can be very effective if they are well-managed and the students are engaged. However, discussions can also be very chaotic and can be difficult to control.Small group work is another common method of classroom communication. It is typically used to allow students to work together on a project or to discuss a topic in depth. Small group work can be very effective if the students are cooperative and the groups are well-organized. However, small group work can also be very chaotic and can be difficult to manage.Presentations are another common method of classroom communication. They are typically used to allow students to share their work with the class. Presentations can be very effective if they are well-planned and the students are prepared. However, presentations can also be very boring and can cause students to tune out if they are not interesting.
question
A filmmaker wants to depict a realistic dramatization of a scientist making and communicating an important scientific discovery. Which plot description would best depict the methods of discovery and communication that a modern professional scientist uses?
answer
The scientist collaborates with others to plan and carry out an experiment and then writes a paper that has a clear conclusion. He submits it to a professional journal for peer review, after which the results are presented publicly.
Explanation: A professional scientist would use the scientific method to make a discovery. They would then communicate their findings through academic papers and presentations.
question
A medical researcher experimented with the effects of calcium intake on the healing time of broken bones. People who had similarly broken bone injuries were divided randomly into two groups, one of which received a calcium supplement and one of which received a placebo. The data showed that there was no significant difference in healing times between the two groups, so the researcher concluded that calcium intake has no effect on bone healing time. Why is the conclusion of the researcher not justified?
answer
The researcher did not use a control group.
Explanation: The researcher's conclusion is not justified because the data does not show a clear difference between the two groups. There is a possibility that the calcium supplement had a small effect on healing time, but the data is not clear enough to say for sure.
question
Which example illustrates public scientific communication?
answer
A scientist collaborates with other scientists to plan an experiment.
Explanation: There are many examples of public scientific communication. One example is when scientists give talks or presentations to the public about their research. This can help people to understand the work that scientists do and why it is important. Another example is when scientists write articles or books that are intended for a general audience. This can help to communicate complex ideas to a wider audience.
question
Two scientists are cutting samples of leaves for analysis. One scientist always clips a sample from the base of the leaf near the stem, and the other scientist always clips a sample from the tip of the leaf. This illustrates a
answer
procedural error.
Explanation: difference in theirThe two scientists are cutting samples of leaves for analysis in different ways. One scientist always clips a sample from the base of the leaf near the stem, while the other scientist always clips a sample from the tip of the leaf. This illustrates a difference in their respective methods.
question
Which statement describes the most common ways in which students and professional scientists communicate the results of their scientific research?
answer
Students communicate results in laboratory reports, and professional scientists communicate results in scientific journals.
question
A scientist wants to study the effects of morning temperatures on flower width. Which is most likely a source of error in this scientific experiment?
answer
The control group flowers were a day older than the experimental group flowers.
Explanation: There are a few potential sources of error in this scientific experiment. The first is that the scientist may not be able to control for all the variables that could affect flower width. For example, if the scientist is studying morning temperatures, they may not be able to control for the amount of sunlight that the flowers receive during the day. This could lead to inaccurate results.Another potential source of error is that the scientist may not be able to measure the width of the flowers accurately. This could lead to errors in the data that is collected.Finally, the scientist may not be able to control for the natural variation in flower width. This means that some of the flowers that are studied may be wider or narrower than others, which could lead to inaccurate results.
question
Which source is considered a primary source of scientific information?
answer
an original research article in a scientific journal
question
Which best describes the role of communication in scientific investigations?
answer
Communication can help identify good scientific questions to further investigate.
Explanation: Communication is essential to scientific investigations because it allows scientists to share their findings with other members of the scientific community. By communicating their findings, scientists can build on each other's work and advance our understanding of the natural world.
question
What is the first way in which biology researchers present the results of their latest research?
answer
through an article published in a scientific journal
Explanation: The first way in which biology researchers present the results of their latest research is by writing a scientific paper. This paper is then peer-reviewed by other scientists in the field to ensure its accuracy and validity. Once it is published, other scientists can read it and build upon the research.
question
When analyzing the results of a scientific experiment, Kevin should base his conclusion on
answer
the empirical evidence that is collected during the experiment.
Explanation:The first way in which biology researchers present the results of their latest research is by writing a scientific paper. This paper is then peer-reviewed by other scientists in the field to ensure its accuracy and validity. Once it is published, other scientists can read it and build upon the research.
question
Which best describes Internet wikis as a source of scientific information?
answer
Wikis are written or edited by anyone.
Explanation: Internet wikis are a source of scientific information because they allow users to collaboratively create and edit web pages. This makes them a useful tool for sharing knowledge and ideas.
question
Juan is planning an investigation about natural reserves. Which of these is most likely to be a reliable source of scientific information on the Internet?
answer
nationalnaturalreserves.gov
Explanation: If Juan is looking for scientific information on natural reserves, he should look for websites that are hosted by government agencies or scientific organizations. These websites are more likely to contain accurate and up-to-date information than websites that are not associated with a reputable source.
question
Which example illustrates public scientific communication?
answer
A scientist sends a preview copy of a journal article to some colleagues.
Explanation: There are many examples of public scientific communication. One example is when scientists give talks or presentations to the general public about their research. This can be done in person, through the media, or online. Another example is when scientists write articles or books for a general audience.
question
Two scientists wrote a paper detailing their research and conclusions and submitted it to a scientific journal. Several months later, they received the paperback from the publisher with many comments attached from several fellow scientists. What is most likely the next step taken by the authors of the paper?
answer
They will incorporate the suggestions from their peers and resubmit the paper.
Explanation: The authors of the paper will most likely revise their paper based on the comments from the fellow scientists and resubmit it to the scientific journal.
question
The process through which professional scientists evaluate the quality of each others' research is called
answer
peer review.
Explanation: :The scientific peer review process is when professional scientists evaluate the quality of each others' research. This is done through a process of critical evaluation and assessment, usually by experts in the same field. The aim of the peer review process is to ensure that only high-quality, valid research is published in scientific journals.
question
A scientist told his student assistants that he had sorted groups of mice by their intelligence and asked the assistants to assess the groups' maze-solving abilities. The scientist had not actually sorted the mice by intelligence. The students rated the "highest intelligence" group of mice as the best maze solvers and the "lowest intelligence" group as the worst maze solvers. What was the scientist trying to demonstrate by doing this experiment?
answer
People can introduce their own biases into an experiment.
Explanation: The scientist was demonstrating the power of confirmation bias. The students were biased in their assessment of the mice because they expected the highest intelligence" group to be the best maze solvers and the "lowest intelligence" group to be the worst maze solvers. This experiment shows that people are often biased in their judgments, even when they think they are being objective."