Appeasement Before WW1 Worksheet

It didn't have its own army and it wasn't supported by stronger powers like the United States.

He thought that since Germany had struggled throughout the war, Germany needed a break. Basically he felt that if they just did what Hitler asked, they wouldn't have to be in another war.

(Answer may vary, but here's mine) I think it does, because the meaning behind it was that Winston Churchill didn't like Chamberlain's idea of appeasement because it just gave Hitler another chance to start war. When it turned out he was right, a war began. So it shows that he thought that Chamberlain was being a suck-up to Hitler just to protect himself.

Answer will vary. Just think of something you did by giving in that you regretted, list the consequences, and explain how the outcome could have been different had you not given in at all. Easy.

It took place at the house of commons on October 5, 1938. The goal was to make peace and avoid war.

They wanted to avoid war, too because they weren't going to be able to fight Hitler because his army was too strong.

He said they needed to start building themselves a strong army.

It took place on October 5, 1938 in the house of commons. The purpose of the speech was the promotion of peace.

The British people made it too easy for Hitler to snatch Czechoslovakia

He said they should have joined forces with France so they could be safer. He didn't offer any evidence for his claim.

They would lose their independence and the Nazis would take them over

It was written in 1960. Bartlett wrote it to show what Germany's reaction was to the whole thing between Hitler and Chamberlain.

He thought that Hitler would have just started a war, and he didn't have any support for this claim.

He was saying that Britain came completely unprepared for the war, even though it was unexpected. But the Czechoslovakian army was already prepared.

It was written on March 15, 1939 after Hitler invaded Czechoslovakia.

He claimed it was to avoid war. It gave them peace for a little bit.

It was written in 1957. He wrote it as a defense for the appeasement policy.

He said it was a good way to not go into war with Germany. His evidence was that Hitler didn't even want to go to war.

I don't think it was the right policy because it wasn't fair. It just gave Hitler his way and he got what he wanted.

Austria, Czechoslovakia

It would level their industry and economy.

Italy had more expansion than Germany. I think this was because it conquered other countries.

In 1935 it was in itself and northeast of Germany. Then it went east and west.

It was occupied by France. Hitler said the treaty was useless.

They were trying to avoid war.

They weren't invited.

Hitler thought that the democrats from the west weren't able to fight. He wasn't satisfied.

Chamberlain wanted peace, but Churchill wanted war. Their policies basically contradict one another.

Britain wasn't really open to conservative policy. They were scared that if something happened to the country or government, they wouldn't be able to fix it. I think that the biggest reason had something to do with the Labour campaign.

He wanted peace between the nations.

Mariana, Caroline, Wake, Gilbert. I think they needed them not only for the effectiveness of basic expansion but also because it had something to do with resources. Maybe business or just the need of the resources themselves.

Japan wanted to expand for resources. Germany wanted expansion for the economy and industry. These are similar reasons.

(not really sure) I think they are residents of Shanghai and they're watching everything go up in flames because of Japan. Since there aren't any women, my only guess would be that they are all inside hiding or something bad has happened to them.